MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C501A0.30905E50" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C501A0.30905E50 Content-Location: file:///C:/9648A913/MTRPT_FormatEdit3_noUnderline_Changes.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
SURVEY ON MARRIAGE
Prepared for
Montanans for Children, Youth, and Families=
8657-55
December
1997
TABLE OF CONTENTS=
1. TABLE OF CO=
NTENTS..........................................=
............... I
=
span>ORGANIZATION
OF THE REPORT.......................=
............... ii
=
span>RESEARCH
DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY..............=
........ iii
2. MARRIAGE TO=
DAY..........................................=
.................. 1
Why t=
he
Decline?............................=
................................... 1
=
span>What
Is Important to a Strong Marriage?..=
........................... 4
=
span>Current
Cultural and Public Policy Considerations............ 6
MARITAL HEALTH..........................................=
......................... 8
Marital Health Indicators...........=
......................................... 8
Marital Status Profile..........................................=
..................... 9
Pre-Marital Factors..........................................=
...................... 12
Behaviors and Interaction in
Marriage............................=
....... 15
Religiosity..........................................=
......................... 15
Conflict
Resolution..........................=
............................ 19
Divorce.................................................................=
................ 21
Relationship Strength..........................................=
.................. 24
ATTITUDES ABOUT MARRIAGE............=
............................ 25
Expectations..........................................=
............................... 25
Marriage As An Institution
Would you Marry the Same Pers=
on
Again?........................... =
span>32
Divorce Considerations..........................................=
.............. 33
Pre-Marital Considerations
3. APPENDIX A: INTERVIEW SCHEDULE
4. APPENDIX B: OPEN-ENDED VERBATIMS
5. APPENDIX C: CROSSTABULATIONS
ORGANIZATION OF T=
HE
REPORT
To aid the reader in using the sections which follow, we present =
this
report in the following sequence.
The Research Design and Methodology describes how the research was designed and implemented, as well as how the sample was selected and validated. In addition, a sample stratificati= on matrix is provided to clarify how counties and media markets were grouped.<= o:p>
The Detailed Findings
provide a description and analysis of the results and are supplemented with=
key
charts and tables.
The Interview Schedule=
b>
reproduces the survey instrument, or questionnaire, as it was used in
interviewing.
The Open-Ended Verbatims=
are
the respondents’ responses to the open-ended questions.
The Crosstabulations impart
a detailed look at the survey results among demographic, regional, and atti=
tudinal
variables.
Research Design a=
nd
Methodology
This study contains results from a random sample of 400 adults in=
Interviews in
Any variation in reported percentage=
s of
+ 1 percentage point within this report is due only to rounding.
MARRIAGE TODAY
In the state of
Half (50%) of adults in
In this section of the report, we
explore why adults in
Why the decline?<= o:p>
When forced to rate a series of
potential societal trends that may or may not have contributed to problems =
in
marriage today, we find more permis=
sive
attitudes about sex outside of marriage and about divorce are seen as two changes in our society that have
contributed most to problems in marriage today.
In
Concern regarding changing attitudes
about sex outside of marriage is more prevalent among those who are actively
religious than those who are not.
Those who were married by minister or rabbi (55% rate this item a 9 =
or
10), Christians (54%), born-again Christians (66%), pray with their spouse
(68%), and attend church frequently (61%) are more likely than their
counterparts to see an increasingly liberal attitude about sex as having le=
d to
the problems in marriage today.
This belief is also salient among older married couples (57%) and wo=
men
(57%) who see this as a top contributor to marital problems. Older adults (58%) and those who d=
o not
have a college degree (53%) are also more likely to see this as a damaging
factor. Finally, couples who =
have
been married less than 6 years (58%) and 11 years or more (54%) are more li=
kely
to attribute this permissive attitude about sex to marriage problems than
couples who have been married for 6-10 years (34%).
Concerning a growing acceptance of
divorce in our society, almost half of the women in the state (45%), and th=
ose
who only have a high school education or less (46%) see this attitudinal sh=
ift
as a major blow to the institution of marriage. Additionally, those who attend chu=
rch frequently
(48%) and those who have never cohabited (44%) are also more likely than th=
eir
counterparts to acknowledge the negative influence that our society’s
growing acceptance of divorce is having on marriage.
Partisanship and ideology also factor
into this perspective.
Self-identified conservatives (46%) and Republicans are more likely =
than
liberals and Democrats to believe this changing attitude about divorce is d=
amaging
marriage.
Asked about other factors contributi=
ng
to a decline in the quality of marriage, we find slightly lower ratings for=
greater economic and financial pressur=
es on
families (7.6), greater time pr=
essure
on parents (7.5), and more perm=
issive
attitudes about having babies out-of-wedlock (7.3).
Almost half of the separated or divo=
rced
adults (45%) in Montana feel that g=
reater
economic and financial pressures on families have greatly contributed to
the problems in marriage. Wom=
en
(38%) and those who do not have a college degree (35%) are also more likely=
to
feel this way. These responde=
nts
may be reacting to personal experience, since these groups tend to have gre=
ater
financial demands.
Greater time pressures on parents is
seen as a significant contributor to problems in marriage by more women (36=
%)
than men (25%), married women (38%) more so than married men (26%), and mot=
hers
who work full-time (42%) more than mothers who work part-time (20%), or not=
at
all (29%). Again, personal ex=
perience
plays a strong role in what element a person perceives as contributing to
marital problems. Respondents=
aged
35 - 64 (36%), those who do not consider themselves born-again (36%), and w=
ho
would not remarry their current spouse (45%) also feel that greater time pressures on parents =
is a
great contributor to problems in marriage.
Many subgroups are polarized on the
issue that more permissive attitudes
about having babies out-of-wedlock have contributed to marital
problems. The following group=
s are
more likely to believe that having =
babies
out-of-wedlock has hurt the institution of marriage:
·=
; =
Respondents aged 65 and older=
&=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; 62%
·=
; =
Widows =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; 55%
·=
; =
Married respondents aged 50 a=
nd
older &n=
bsp; 55%
·=
; =
Republicans &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; 53=
%
·=
; =
Stay-at-home mothers &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; 53%
·=
; =
Conservatives &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; 49%
·=
; =
Respondents who are born-agai=
n &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; 49%
·=
; =
Those who attend church frequ=
ently &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; 47%
·=
; =
Respondents aged 50-64 &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; 47%
·=
; =
Respondents rate their own
marriage very strong 47%
·=
; =
Women =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; 46%
·=
; =
Parents with 4 or 5 children<=
span
style=3D'mso-tab-count:1'> &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; 46%
·=
; =
Those who do not have a colle=
ge
degree &=
nbsp; 45%
·=
; =
Those who have never cohabite=
d &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; 45%
·=
; =
Married adults &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; 44%
Overall, nearly one-third (30%) of
respondents feel that a decline in
religious faith and church attendance (6.8) is an important contributor=
to
marital problems in the United States.&nbs=
p;
Those who are actively religious put more weight on this item than do
their counterparts: a third (33%) of Christians rate this element a 9 or 10,
while only 15% of non-Christians do; half (51%) of those born-again feel th=
is
has been a great contributor, while only 18% of those not born-again do; th=
ose
who pray with their spouse (44%) are more likely than those who do not pray
together (20%) to rate this factor high; and finally, those who attend chur=
ch
frequently (43%) are more likely those who attend infrequently (21%), and n=
ot
at all (16%) to rate this item a 9 or 10 on a 1-10 scale.
Respondents aged 50-64 (39%),
self-identified conservatives (36%), Republicans (41%), and Democrats (32%)=
are
also more likely than their cohorts to feel a decline in religious faith has
negatively impacted marriages today.
This sentiment is shared by women who work part-time (wives, 41%;
mothers, 44%), and parents of 4 or 5 children (46%).
Finally, adults in the state give the
lowest rating to more couples livin=
g away
from extended family (5.9) as weakening marriage today.
What is important=
to a
strong marriage?
A key element in assessing the condi=
tion
of marriage today is found in how a strong marriage is defined. To that end, we tested a series of
relationship factors to determine which factors respondents consider import=
ant
to a strong marriage.
Overall, the first tier of attributes
considered the most important to a strong marriage among Montana adults
consists of commitment and communication.&=
nbsp;
The next grouping of relationship factors are fidelity, friendship, =
and
conflict resolution. Next are
shared interests and goals and sexual satisfaction. Finally, the lowest rated factors =
are
financial security and religious faith.&nb=
sp;
However, with religious faith we note a higher intensity behind its
importance than others in that a third (31%) give it a 9 or 10 importance
rating. The following table
displays these results:
FACTOR &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; MEAN &=
nbsp; TOP
2
Lif=
elong
commitment &nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; =
9.5 &=
nbsp; 88%
Good
communication =
&nb=
sp; =
&nb=
sp; 9.4 &=
nbsp; 81%
Fid=
elity &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; 9.2 &=
nbsp; 78%
Clo=
se
friendship &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; 9.1 &=
nbsp; 75%
Abi=
lity
to resolve conflict =
&nb=
sp; =
9=
.0 &=
nbsp; 67%
Sha=
red
interests and goals =
&nb=
sp; =
8.1 &=
nbsp; 41%
Sex=
ual
satisfaction &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; &=
nbsp; &nbs=
p; 7.7 &=
nbsp; 32%
Fin=
ancial
security  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; 7.2 &=
nbsp; 24%
Rel=
igious
faith &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp;  =
; &n=
bsp; 7.0 &=
nbsp; 31%
Montana adults who rate their own
marriage as very strong (10 on a scale of 1-10) also rate the importance of
each of the above factors as higher than the overall average. These same respondents also rate lifelong commitment, good communication, close friendship, abili=
ty to
resolve conflict, and shared
interests and goals significantly higher than do those respondents who =
rate
their own marriage between a 6-8 on the 10 point scale.
Other trends in how a strong marriag=
e is
defined demonstrate how behaviors and personal experience are reflected in
attitudes and evaluations:
·
In general, women, married
respondents, and younger adults put a higher value on good communication than do their counterparts. Along with lifelong commitment (9.6), women rate communication (9.6) as the most important of the factors assess=
ed. This is also the case for responde=
nts
aged 25-34 (9.7) and 35-49 (9.5). =
span>Good communication also tops the l=
ist
for those who are separated/divorced (9.5), particularly separated/divorced
women (9.7), those engaged or cohabiting (9.6), and singles (9.5), especial=
ly
single women (9.8). Both youn=
g married
couples (9.7) and married couples 35-49 (9.5) rate good communication signi=
ficantly
higher than do older married couples (9.1). Those who work full-time and 50 or=
more
hour per week also put more emphasis on communication.
·
Having a common religious faith is rated significantly higher by older
respondents (8.0) than other age groups.&n=
bsp;
Also, Republicans (7.7) rate this element more important than do Dem=
ocrats
(6.8) or Independents (6.5). =
Widows
(8.0) and married respondents (7.1) put more emphasis on religion than do t=
hose
who are separated/divorced (6.0).
Hence, older married respondents (7.5) rate this as more important t=
han
young married respondents do (6.5).
Those who are actively religious also believe that religious faith is
very important to a strong marriage: those born-again (8.3), couples who pr=
ay
together frequently (8.2), those who attend church frequently (8.1), couples
who pray together infrequently (7.5), Christians (7.3), and those who attend
church infrequently (6.4).
·
Women put more value than men=
do
on several of the elements tested: =
good
communication (women, 9.6; men, 9.2), fidelity
(women, 9.4; men, 8.9), close frien=
dship
(women, 9.3; men, 8.9), ability to
resolve conflict (women, 9.2; men, 8.7), shared interests and goals (women, 8.4; men, 7.8), and financial security (women, 7.4; me=
n,
7.0).
·
There are no cases in which m=
en
give a higher importance rating to the items tested. However, men and women give equal
importance ratings to lifelong commitment, sexual satisfaction, and common
religious faith.
current
cultural and public policy Considerations
While the government can not directly
increase the commitment, communication, and fidelity among married couples,
Montana adults generally agree that there are several things that the gover=
nment
could do, and stop doing, that would help families.
The majority (64%) of respondents fe=
el
that the state government helps the quality of family life in Montana. Only one in five (22%) feels that =
the
government hinders family life. Men
(69%) are more likely to feel the government is helping family life more th=
an
women (59%), especially married men (71%) compared to married women (59%).<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Those who have at least a college
education (72%) are more likely than those who have a high school education=
or
less (60%) to feel the government is helping families, and so are responden=
ts
who participated in pre-marital counseling (74%) as compared to those who d=
id
not (59%). Those who attend c=
hurch
frequently are also more likely to feel the Montana government is helping
families (72%).
When asked what one thing the state
government could do that it is not currently doing to help families, loweri=
ng
taxes (13%) topped the list.
Respondents also mentioned that they would like the government to
improve/help schools/education (10%), provide more/better jobs (10%), provi=
de
financial counseling (6%), and intervene in marriage/divorce (6%). Other mentions include general help
(5%), make welfare more difficult to get (3%), support pro-family recreation
(3%), and others miscellaneous comments (10%). Twelve percent (12%) of respondent=
s said
that the government should do nothing to help families. Thirty-one percent (31%) don’=
;t
know or are unsure. (Please n=
ote:
when respondents are asked to give more than one response to a question, the
total doesn’t always add up to 100%.)
Changing laws (13%), such as making
gambling illegal and reforming welfare, topped the list when respondents we=
re
asked what they would like the Montana state government to stop doing that =
it
currently does that hinders the quality of family life in the state. Respondents also feel strongly abo=
ut
taxes (12%) and that government should stop cutting youth/family programs
(9%). An additional 7% mention
other issues such as education funding, create more jobs, and other environ=
mental
issues. Finally, 8% say gover=
nment
should reduce its size and influence.
Most (55%) say that they do not know of anything that the government
should stop doing.
Beyond the need for personal effort =
to
maintain a strong love in marriage, there are differing opinions about what
legal steps should be taken to govern those who want to get divorced. A plurality (32%) of adults in the=
state
take the position that the law should prevent someone who wants a divorce f=
rom
obtaining it unless the spouse has been abusive, unfaithful, or has abandon=
ed
the marriage. This is in line=
with
the most widely accepted considerations for divorce. A complete breakdown of
those legal steps accepted by adults is displayed in the following chart:
Figure 1
____________________________________=
___________________
_______________________________________________=
________
As evident in the chart, roughly hal=
f of
adults in the state are split between allowing a divorce to someone seeking=
it
without penalty (24%) or allowing divorce but requiring the grantee to give=
up
primary custody of children and more than half of the couple’s assets
(25%). Clearly, there is no g=
eneral
consensus on which action would be most effective when one spouse wants to =
divorce
and the other wants to work things out and stay together.
MARITAL HEALTH
Although people perceive the quality=
of
marriage to be weaker than it was 30 years ago, reported marital behaviors
demonstrate its importance. I=
n this
section, we review the basic marital health across the state today through
reported behaviors and personal assessments.
Marital Health In=
dicators
A key objective of this study is to
identify key indicators of marital health in the state of Montana today.
1.&n=
bsp;
Current marital status;
2.&n=
bsp;
Total percentage who ever have
been divorced;
3.&n=
bsp;
Total percentage who ever have
cohabited;
4.&n=
bsp;
Total percentage who have
received pre-marital counseling;
5.&n=
bsp;
Respondents’ personal
ratings of sexual satisfaction;
6.&n=
bsp;
Respondents’ personal
ratings of the strength of own relationship.
While several factors certainly feed=
into
the health of marriage in a particular state, initially, we have identified
these questions as leading indicators of marital health:
|
Factor |
MT Mean |
MT % |
|
Married |
-- |
66% |
|
Single, never married |
-- |
11% |
|
Engaged |
-- |
2% |
|
Widowed |
-- |
11% |
|
Now divorce/separate |
-- |
8% |
|
Total been divorced |
-- |
25% |
|
Now cohabit |
-- |
2% |
|
Total have cohabited |
-- |
21% |
|
Pre-marital counsel |
-- |
32% |
|
Sexual satisfaction |
7.7 |
41% (9-10) |
|
Relationship strength |
8.8 |
70% (9-10) |
Given this is the pilot study in this
project, we do not have past data in this format with which to compare. Tracking these behavioral indicato=
rs
will demonstrate movement with respect to general marital health. With the current data, there are s=
everal
important interactions and trends regarding certain variables that are expl=
ored
further below.
Marital Status Pr=
ofile
As detailed above, a majority (66%) =
of
Montana adults are currently married, while only 11% are single and have ne=
ver
been married. Regionally, the
MISLA/Helena/ Spokane media market has the highest percentage of married ad=
ults
(70%), while not a statistical difference, Butte has the lowest (59%). Other relevant statistics regarding
marital status include: 46% o=
f those
who have been divorced or widowed at some point have remarried, 21% of adul=
ts
have previously cohabited, 2% of adults currently live with a significant
other, and 18% of those now married at some point cohabited outside of marr=
iage.
In addition to the current marital
status statistics, the length of marriage, who performed the marriage, and =
the
presence of children provide a general profile of the state’s marital
status.
First, most (69%) marriages in the s=
tate
of Montana are 11 years or more in length.=
Twelve percent (12%) of respondents report that they have been marri=
ed 6
to 10 years, 17% for 1 to 5 years, and only 1% have been married for less t=
han
a year. The following chart s=
hows a
detailed breakout of marital length in Montana: